Is the virtual RV-7 in FSX with BTS mods "better" than flying the real thing? Or is the real RV-7A "better" than any desktop simulation could ever be? We are going to break down every variable: flight dynamics, cost, accessibility, maintenance, and pure visceral thrill.
FSX + BTS. Zero risk, zero tools, zero grease under your fingernails. Round 4: Emotional Reward (The X-Factor) FSX + BTS: You can fly the BTS mod for 1,000 hours. You will master the pattern at Oshkosh. You will land on the aircraft carrier (using mods). But when you unplug the computer, you are still in your office chair. The achievement is intellectual, not visceral. fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
| Feature | FSX + BTS RV-7 | Real RV-7 / RV-7A | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Better ($150) | Worse ($80k+) | | Convenience | Better (fly anytime) | Worse (weather, maintenance) | | Realism | Good (85%) | Perfect (100%) | | Risk | Better (none) | Worse (life & limb) | | Satisfaction | Low | Better (indescribable) | The Ultimate Recommendation: The Hybrid Approach Stop asking "which is better" and start asking "which is better for me right now ?" Is the virtual RV-7 in FSX with BTS
FSX + BTS. It is not even close. The real plane is a financial commitment rivaling a luxury car or a college education. The sim is a weekend splurge. Round 3: Maintenance & Hassle (The "Better" Reality Check) This is where the keyword "better" gets subjective. FSX + BTS