Manifesto On Algorithmic Sabotage Page

When a system optimizes for engagement by radicalizing users, refusing to provide stable data is self-defense. When a system optimizes for profit by surveilling children, poisoning the dataset is a moral obligation. We are not sabotaging the future; we are sabotaging a specific present —one where a few trillion-parameter matrices dictate the terms of human interaction.

We have witnessed algorithmic systems collapse democracies through micro-targeted rage. We have watched logistics algorithms squeeze the humanity out of warehouse workers. We have felt the existential vertigo of being curated by a machine that does not know what a soul is. manifesto on algorithmic sabotage

A Declaration of Withdrawal from the Optimization Economy Published by the Consortium for Post-Digital Stability Dated: The Era of Systemic Fatigue Preamble: The Pendulum Swings For three decades, we have been told that algorithms are neutral servants. We were promised liberation from drudgery, precision removed from human error, and efficiency divorced from emotion. We built the recommendation engines, the supply chain optimizers, the automated trading desks, and the social scoring mechanisms. We fed them our data, our labor, and our attention. When a system optimizes for engagement by radicalizing

The current generation of algorithms (Large Language Models, Recommender Systems, Dynamic Pricing Engines) share a single fatal flaw: they optimize for a proxy metric that is easily measured (clicks, time-on-site, throughput, volatility) rather than the actual human good (sanity, community, stability, joy). A Declaration of Withdrawal from the Optimization Economy